NCAA Executive Committee
Subcommittee on Gender and Diversity Issues Report on
References to American
Indians in Intercollegiate Athletics
August 2005
Background/History
During its April 2001 meeting, the NCAA
Executive Committee reviewed correspondence regarding the use of American
Indian mascots, nicknames and logos by NCAA member institutions. While the issue of American Indian
mascots and images in college athletics has been the subject of discussion for
the past five years, three recent events prompted the Executive
Committee’s discussion:
1.
The Executive Committee’s detailed review
of issues related to the Confederate Battle Flag and its resulting criteria for
evaluating NCAA predetermined championship sites. The criteria include, in part,
“the ability of a site to promote an atmosphere of respect for and
sensitivity to the dignity of every person.”
2.
St. Cloud State University President Roy
Saigo’s request to the Executive Committee to consider a resolution
stating the NCAA does not condone the use of Native American logos and
nicknames.
3.
The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights’
Statement on the use of Native American images and nicknames as sports symbols,
stating in part, “Schools should not use their influence to perpetuate
misrepresentations of any culture or people. Stereotypes of American Indians teach
all students that stereotyping of minority groups is acceptable, a dangerous
lesson in a diverse society.”
The Executive Committee referred the
review of the issue of eliminating the use of American Indian mascots,
nicknames and logos by members of the NCAA to the Minority
The M
2005
M
No further Review
After reviewing the self-evaluations, there were several institutions that no longer have any references to Native Americans in their athletics programs. These institutions are:
·
·
·
·
·
Eastern
·
·
·
·
·
State
·
·
·
These institutions either removed all references to Native American culture or never had Native American culture as a part of their athletics programs. The staff informed these institutions that there would be no further review by the NCAA regarding Native American mascots, nicknames and/or imagery in their athletics programs.
Sanctioned by the Native
Americans in their Community
There were several institutions with documented outreach to Native American communities in their local areas. These institutions are:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
These institutions provided the
staff with detailed information of their outreach to various Native American
communities near their campus. With
regard to the University of North Carolina-Pembroke, several members of the
Native American community are active members of their board of trustees. Although there are no historically
Native American/American Indian colleges or universities (similar to
Historically Black Colleges and Universities), there is substantial evidence
that UNC – Pembroke was founded as a school for Native Americans (founded
as the Croatan Normal School to educate Native American teachers) and has been
a part of the Native American community for 118 years. The M
With regard to the other institutions in this section, the staff received several written responses from numerous Native American organizations, tribes, interest groups, and individuals stating their opposition to the use of Native American culture in their athletics programs. Although several of these institutions have reached out to Native Americans in their local communities, several Native Americans in and outside of those communities are opposed to the use of Native American culture in intercollegiate athletics.
Nickname with and without
Imagery
Indiana University of Pennsylvania (IUP) decided to change their mascot from an “Indian” to a bear named “Cherokee.” IUP determined that they would retain their “Indians” nickname and noted that although their athletics teams are referred to as the “Indians,” there is no Native American Imagery associated with the nickname.
No Change and Broad Response
There were several institutions that provided very broad responses in their self-evaluations and/or indicated that their institution is not considering changing any references to Native American culture in intercollegiate athletics. These institutions are:
·
·
· University of Illinois-Champaign (Illini)
·
·
·
·
·
·
Southeastern
The staff notes that although
Southeastern
The staff notes that the other institutions in this category have substantial references to Native American culture in name and imagery. Although some of these institutions reached out to the Native American communities near their campus, the staff received substantial written opposition to the use of Native American culture at some of these institutions. It is important to note that the self-evaluation responses from these institutions were not similar. Specifically, some institutions provided minimal information, whereas other institutions provided the staff with substantial information. However, all of these institutions indicated that based on their research, the use of Native American culture at their institution was to honor Native American culture. In addition, the reasons for not considering any changes varied from institution; however, all of these institutions stated that there would be no change to any Native American references in their athletics programs in the near future.
Extensions
·
The
NCAA
Authority
The M
1. Constitution, Article 2.2.2 – Cultural Diversity and Gender Equity:
It is the responsibility of each member
institution to establish and maintain an environment that values cultural
diversity and gender equity among its student-athletes and intercollegiate
athletics department staff.
2.
Constitution, Article 2.4 – The Principle
of Sportsmanship and Ethical Conduct:
For intercollegiate athletics to promote
the character development of participants, to enhance the integrity of higher
education and to promote civility in society, student-athletes, coaches, and
all others associated with these athletics programs and events should adhere to
such fundamental values as respect, fairness, civility, honesty and
responsibility. These values should be manifest not only in athletics participation
but also in the broad spectrum of activities affecting the athletics program.
3.
Constitution, Article 2.6 – The Principle
of Nondiscrimination:
The Association shall promote an
atmosphere of respect for and sensitivity to the dignity of every person. It is the policy of the Association to
refrain from discrimination with respect to its governance policies,
educational programs, activities and employment practices.
The committee believes institutions
currently using American Indian mascots, nicknames, and symbols often do so as
part of an honored and revered college tradition, established to emulate noble
qualities of American Indian people and their culture, such as courage,
dignity, strength and loyalty.
Based on the specific core values
delineated in the NCAA Constitution and the information the staff has received
on this issue, the M
The Executive Committee Subcommittee on
Gender and Diversity Issues recommends that the Executive Committee adopt the
following:
Gender
and Diversity Issues Recommendations
The NCAA objects to
institutions using racial/ethnic/national origin references in their
intercollegiate athletics programs.
Several institutions have made changes that adhere to the core values of
the NCAA Constitution pertaining to cultural diversity, ethical sportsmanship
and nondiscrimination. All institutions are encouraged to promote these core
values and take proactive steps at every NCAA event through institutional event
management to enhance the integrity of intercollegiate athletics related to
these issues.
These issues are
very complex and institutions need to retain institutional autonomy to address
this issue. While the NCAA
understands institutional autonomy is necessary in order to adhere to the
mission of the NCAA, the Association has a duty to address actions and
behaviors that are not consistent with core values and principles of the NCAA
Constitution. Therefore, it is the
responsibility of everyone associated with an athletics program and event,
including student-athletes, fans and coaches, to maintain an environment that
promotes an atmosphere of respect for
and sensitivity to the dignity of every person.
There
are certain events in intercollegiate athletics, such as NCAA championship
competition, that are more of a public forum rather than home contests. Therefore, for those institutions that choose not to remove all references
to Native American culture (with NCAA approved exclusions), the NCAA recommends
the following courses of action:
Championships:
1.
Institutions
with hostile or abusive racial/ethnic/national origin mascots, nicknames or
imagery will be prohibited from hosting any NCAA national championship competition.
2.
Institutions
with hostile or abusive racial/ethnic/national origin mascots, nicknames or
imagery must take reasonable steps
to cover up any of these references at any predetermined NCAA championship
competition site that has been previously awarded. The financial responsibility to take
reasonable steps rests on each institution and these reasonable steps must be
taken in timely manner.
3.
Institutions
displaying or promoting hostile or abusive racial/ethnic/national origin references
on their mascots, cheerleaders, dance teams, and band member uniforms or
paraphernalia are prohibited from wearing this material at an NCAA championship
competition site. In order for
institutions to fully comply with this recommendation, the effective date
should be
4.
Institutions
with student-athletes wearing uniforms or paraphernalia with hostile or abusive
racial/ethnic/national origin references must ensure that those uniforms or
paraphernalia are not worn during NCAA championship competition. This recommendation should be effective
immediately.
Non-Championship (Best Practices):
Institutions that continue to use hostile
or abusive racial/ethnic/national origin mascots, nicknames or imagery are
encouraged to take steps to improve the environment and climate where they
compete. The NCAA noted several
courses of action that are listed below as “Best Practices” for
institutions to implement.
1.
2.
NCAA publications. Institutions should design their publications and campus materials in
a manner that removes all hostile or abusive racial/ethnic/national origin
references. The subcommittee noted that this is the current policy of the NCAA
National
3.
Education/Appreciation/
4.
issues that concern
the Native American community. In
addition, the subcommittee suggested initiatives that would educate the
membership via public service announcements and posters. The subcommittee also
noted that the NCAA’s “
5.
Conference-level
collaboration. The subcommittee recommended that institutions develop
a partnership with conference offices in order to address this issue at the
institutional level, as well as with the media. The subcommittee suggested institutions
include this issue on their conference meeting agenda in order to discuss ways
to improve their relationship with the Native American Community and educate
member institutions.
Rosie Stallman, Education Services.