REPORT
OF THE
NCAA
MEN’S VOLLEYBALL COMMITTEE
1. ACTION ITEMS.
a. Bracket
Format.
(1) Recommendation. Based on an invitation from the cabinet,
it is recommended that the men’s volleyball championship bracket be expanded
from four teams to eight teams effective with the 2009 championship. Also, that all eight teams selected
participate at the final site.
Competition will be held the first full weekend in May (Thursday, Friday
and Saturday). The championship
format will be single-elimination without a third-place match, which is the
current practice.
(2) Rationale. Inviting all eight teams to the final
site will minimize the amount of missed class time in addition to creating a
festival atmosphere that will allow all student-athletes the opportunity to
have the same championship experience.
It will also allow the committee to correctly pair the seeds (one versus
eight, two versus seven, etc.). By
expanding the bracket, it will provide 84 additional student-athlete opportunities.
Please also reference
the informational item (put forward by the men’s volleyball committee to
be reviewed at the February 2007 meeting) which will highlight where
men’s volleyball stands in comparison with other National Collegiate and
Division I Championships when looking at their bracket access ratio.
(3) Estimated
Budget Impact. The financial
impact is as follows: [Attachment]
Proposed
Eight
team bracket
Transportation: $40,317
Per Diem: $34,650
Game Expenses: $9,263
Overhead Expenses: $8,400
Awards: $840
Total Increase: $93,470
Note: The budget impact
of the recommendation (having all teams at the championship site) will be less
in comparison to having regional sites before reaching the championship site.
(4) Student-Athlete
Impact. There will not be any
additional missed class time with this format. Under the current format, teams arrive
at the site of
the championship on Tuesday
and return to campus on Sunday.
Competition is not currently held on Friday. By bringing all eight teams to one site,
competition will be Thursday, Friday and Saturday. Teams will still be able to return to
campus on Sunday.
b. Automatic
Qualification.
(1) Recommendation. That the Eastern Intercollegiate Volleyball
Association, the Midwestern Intercollegiate Volleyball Association and the
Mountain Pacific Sports Federation be granted automatic qualification to the
2008 championship.
(2) Rationale. All eligible conferences are being
recommended for automatic qualification.
(3) Estimated
Budget Impact. None.
(4) Student-Athlete
Impact. None.
2.
INFORMATIONAL ITEM.
Bracket Size Calculation.
The NCAA Men’s Volleyball Committee requests that the NCAA Division I Championships/Competition Cabinet re-evaluate the criteria that are used to determine the bracket sizes for National Collegiate Championships. These championships are intended to provide an experience for all student-athletes in multiple divisions. The current system only considers the sport sponsorship by Division I institutions, thus not considering any sponsorship and/or growth in Divisions II and III.
Bracket Access Ratio. In evaluating the championship opportunities that are provided to the student-athletes in the Division I and National Collegiate Championships, there appears to be a distinct difference in the opportunities provided to the men’s volleyball student-athletes. Below is a chart that illustrates the bracket access ratio (number of eligible institutions divided by the bracket size) of Division I team championships and National Collegiate Championships.
|
Sport |
Division I sponsorship |
Total Sponsorship |
Bracket Size |
Bracket Access Ratio |
|
Men’s
Basketball |
326
(100%) |
326 |
64 |
1:5.1 |
|
Women’s
Basketball |
325
(99%) |
325 |
64 |
1:5.1 |
|
Women’s
Volleyball |
315
(97%) |
315 |
64 |
1:4.9 |
|
Baseball |
284
(87%) |
284 |
64 |
1:4.4 |
|
Women’s
Soccer |
301
(92%) |
301 |
64 |
1:4.7 |
|
Softball |
269
(83%) |
269 |
64 |
1:4.2 |
|
Men’s
Soccer |
195
(60%) |
195 |
48 |
1:4.1 |
|
I-AA
Football |
116
(36%) |
116 |
16 |
1:7.3 |
|
Field
Hockey |
78
(24%) |
78 |
16 |
1:4.9 |
|
Women’s
Lacrosse |
81
(25%) |
81 |
16 |
1:5.1 |
|
Men’s
Lacrosse |
56
(17%) |
56 |
16 |
1:3.5 |
|
Men’s
Ice Hockey |
58
(18%) |
58 |
16 |
1:3.6 |
|
NC
Women’s Ice Hockey |
33
(10%) |
35 |
8 |
1:4.4 |
|
NC
Women’s Water Polo |
31
(10%) |
61 |
8 |
1:7.6 |
|
*NC
Women’s Bowling |
28
(9%) |
51 |
8 |
1:6.4 |
|
NC Men’s Volleyball |
22 (7%) |
82 |
4 |
1:20.5 |
|
NC
Men’s Water Polo |
21
(6%) |
43 |
4 |
1:10.8 |
All figures are taken from the NCAA Division I
Championships/Competition Cabinet Policies and Operating Procedures [December
2006], Appendix D.
*National Collegiate women’s bowling is
classified as an individual-team sport; however, only the team portion is
currently conducted.
Percentage
of Total Membership. Under the current system, National
Collegiate Championships are evaluated on the percentage of Division I
institutions that sponsor the sport.
Sports that have a loss of sponsorship in Division I or a growth in
sponsorship in Division II or Division III may never be offered the opportunity
for bracket expansion. For example,
men’s volleyball sponsorship has increased by 32 institutions since
1987-88. A majority of this
increase occurred in Division II and Division III and, therefore, is not
included in the calculation for bracket expansion. Below is a chart of the national
collegiate championships and their sponsorship percentage in relation to the
entire membership of the NCAA. Also
listed is the current bracket size.
|
Sport |
Total Sponsorship |
Total Percentage |
Bracket Size |
|
NC
Women’s Bowling |
51 |
4.9% |
8 |
|
*NC
Women’s Ice Hockey |
35 |
5.8% |
8 |
|
NC Men’s
Volleyball |
82 |
8.0% |
4 |
|
NC
Men’s Water Polo |
43 |
4.2% |
4 |
|
NC
Women’s Water Polo |
61 |
5.9% |
8 |
*National
Collegiate women’s ice hockey provides championship opportunities for
student-athletes in Division I and Division II. Therefore, the total percentage is taken
from the 607 institutions in Division I and Division II.
This chart illustrates the fact that the sport of men’s volleyball has the largest sport sponsorship of the National Collegiate team championships at 8.0 percent of the membership, yet remains a four-team championship.
Divisions II and III institutions currently have access through the automatic qualification process of the three conferences that sponsor the sport of men’s volleyball. These conferences are the Mountain Pacific Sports Federation, Eastern Intercollegiate Volleyball Association and the Midwestern Intercollegiate Volleyball Association. The committee strongly believes that with a larger bracket, more institutions may consider adding the sport of men’s volleyball and more conferences may consider conducting conference championships in men’s volleyball.
The committee understands the current policy that prevents sport committees from requesting bracket expansion. The committee requests that the cabinet review the information that has been provided and re-evaluate how bracket sizes are determined for National Collegiate Championships.
Committee Chair:
Ron Shayka,
Staff Liaison: Russ
Yurk, Championships