Major Findings from the Preliminary Analyses of the

NCAA GOALS and SCORE Studies

 

March, 2007

 

 

Findings on Current Student-Athletes (GOALS)

 

Time Commitment Issues

 

         Across the board, student-athletes report spending more time in academic pursuits than reported in the 1987 AIR report.

 

         Athletic time demands on males in Olympic sports and on females appear to have increased relative to those of football and men’s basketball players (vs. 1987 AIR study).

 

         In general, men’s baseball players stand out as having an imbalance in time devoted to athletics versus academics.

 

         Many student-athletes report spending similar time on athletics out-of-season as they do in-season.  However, many (especially males) want to spend even more time on sports than they currently do.

 

Academic Engagement Issues

 

         S-As are at least as engaged as their non-athlete counterparts – this may be especially true of females.

 

         S-As are generally happy with their faculty relationships, but a majority feel that some faculty treat them differently (both positively and negatively) because they are athletes.

 

         Younger S-As are more likely to be aware of and use support services than older S-As.

 

         Many current S-As believe their GPA would be higher if they were not competing in intercollegiate athletics.

 

 

Findings on Former Student-Athletes (SCORE)

 

Academic Success of Former Division I Student-Athletes

 

         Accounting for the varied timelines and academic pathways of student-athletes, we can report a 10-year student-centered graduation rate of 88% for 1994 entering freshman student-athletes in Division I.  Of these student-athletes, 62% graduated from the institution of initial enrollment, and another 26% graduated elsewhere.

 

         The student-athlete graduation rate is relatively high in all sub-groups studied.

 

         GSR remains a better estimate of a student-centered graduation rate as compared to the federal methodology, but both rates underestimate true student-athlete academic success.

 

Academic-Athletic Experience of Former Division I Student-Athletes

 

         Former student-athletes in Division I are very positive about most aspects of the college experience.

 

         SAs who completed the BA degree are more positive in most cases (94% vs 69%), especially about the academic experiences, academic advisors, the development of study skills, and time management.

 

         Some academic-athletic problems reported deal with the time required, courses required, and the need to choose a major other than the first choice.

 

College Majors and Occupational Outcomes

 

         Former student-athletes were slightly more likely to major in business (+3%) and social sciences (+6%) than non-athlete students.  They were slightly less likely to major in science, math and engineering (-6%).

 

         91% of former student-athletes report having full-time jobs (+11% greater than their non-athlete counterparts).

 

         The income levels for student-athletes appear to be similar or higher than those in the comparison cohort. 

 

         89% of former student-athletes believe that the skills and values they learned from college athletics helped them in getting their current job.