REPORT OF THE

DIVISION III INTERPRETATIONS AND LEGISLATION COMMITTEE

 

 

1.            ACTION ITEMS.

 

a.            Interpretation -- 2001 Convention Proposal No. 62 -- Women’s Rowing.

 

(1)        Recommendation.  Approve the following interpretation:

 

Women’s Rowing and Application of NCAA Bylaw 17.1.9.2.  The committee determined that the sport of women's rowing is subject to the provisions of Bylaw 17.1.9.2, inasmuch as the Division III championship is held in the spring.  Therefore, by definition, the spring becomes the "traditional segment" and the fall becomes the "nontraditional segment."  In accordance with Bylaw 17.1.9.2, the sport of women's rowing must conclude all practice and competition in the nontraditional segment by October 30.  [References:  2001 Convention Proposal No. 62 and Bylaws 17.1.9.2 (dividing traditional and nontraditional segments), 17.16.2 (women’s rowing – preseason practice), 17.16.3 (women’s rowing – first date of competition) and 17.16.4 (women’s rowing – end of regular playing season)]

 

(2)        Rationale.  The committee issued this interpretation in response to an inquiry regarding the traditional and nontraditional segments in the sport of women’s rowing.  The confusion arose based on the layout of the current women’s rowing legislation in Bylaw 17.  The interpretation standardizes the sport of women’s rowing with all other Division III fall and spring sports.

 

b.      Interpretation – Division III Institution Revoking Multidivisional Classification.

 

(1)        Recommendation:  Approve the following interpretation:

 

Division III Institution Reclassifying a Sport Currently in Division I to Division III.  A Division III institution, holding multidivisional classification with a sport in Division I, must complete a two-year reclassification process consistent with Bylaws 20.4 and 20.6 prior to being eligible for participation in the Division III championship in that sport.  [References:  Bylaws 20.4 (multidivisional classification) and 20.6 (change of division membership)]

 

(2)        Rationale.  The committee issued this interpretation based on a recommendation from the Division III Membership Committee.  It clarifies that an institution currently holding multidivisional classification with a sport in Division I would be required to complete a two-year reclassification process prior to being eligible for the Division III championship in that sport.  This interpretation is based on prior precedent and the intent of Bylaws 20.4 and 20.6.  The committee supports the Membership Committee’s recommendation for the Management Council to sponsor intent-based legislation to address this situation in the future.

 

c.      Interpretation – Application of Bylaw 14.1.7.2.1.3 to Graduate Student-Athletes.

 

(1)        Recommendation.  Approve the following interpretation:

 

Final Semester/Quarter Exception – Graduate Student.  It is permissible for a student-athlete pursuing a graduate degree to participate in competition while enrolled in less than a full-time program of studies per Bylaw 14.1.7.2.1.3, provided the student-athlete is enrolled in his or her final semester and the institution certifies that the student-athlete is enrolled in the number of credits necessary to achieve the desire graduate degree.

 

(2)        Rationale.  This interpretation was issued to permit a student who has already earned his or her undergraduate degree to participate while enrolled in less than a full-time program of studies per Bylaw 14.1.2.1.3, provided the student-athlete is enrolled in his or her final semester and the institution certifies that the student-athlete is enrolled in the number of credits necessary to achieve the desired graduate degree.  This opportunity is currently available to student-athletes seeking an undergraduate degree.  The committee agreed that this interpretation benefits the few student-athletes in this unique situation while maintaining the integrity of the current legislation in Bylaw 14.1.7.2.1.3.

 

 

2.            INFORMATIONAL ITEM.

 

Deregulation – Review of Bylaws 30 and 31.  The committee will continue its deregulation efforts of Bylaws 30 and 31 during its February 2002 in-person meeting.  It is envisioned that the committee will present recommended changes to the Management Council in April 2002.

 

 

 

 

Chair:   Suzanne Coffey, Bates College

Staff liaisons:                        Chris T. Martin; Mweni Ekpo