DIII Presidents Council
4/02
DIVISION III
STUDENT-ATHLETE REINSTATEMENT COMMITTEE
Summary of
Recommendations
ACTION ITEMS --
MANAGEMENT COUNCIL ONLY
|
1. |
ISSUE: |
Policies
and Procedures. |
|
Committee Recommendation: |
||
|
|
Approve
two amendments to the committee’s policies and procedures: a. That for the
purpose of fulfilling a reinstatement withholding condition, the contest(s)
must occur during the traditional season (i.e., championship segment), and
the contests must be considered for the team’s NCAA championship selection. b. Refinement of
reconsideration procedures.
Subsequent to the committee's appeal decision, an institution may
request that the staff reconsider its initial decision if the institution
submits newly discovered information that existed at the time of the decision
but was not available to the institution or the student-athlete. If the institution then seeks to have
the committee review the staff’s decision it may appeal. |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
|
Approved
the two amendments to the committee’s policies and procedures. |
|
INFORMATION ITEMS
|
1. |
ISSUE: |
Issuance of Directives. |
|
Committee Action: |
||
|
|
The
committee discussed whether it would continue to issue directives. The committee concluded that it would
continue to issue directives since directives are key components of its goal
of being responsive to the membership.
Specifically, directives provide the membership with a summary of key
actions by the committee to codify case precedent or to highlight a shift in
case precedent. Directives are
listed on the student-athlete reinstatement Web site and published in The
NCAA News. |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
|
Accepted
the information. |
|
|
2. |
ISSUE: |
Academic Fraud Directive. |
|
Committee Action: |
||
|
|
The
committee reviewed its December 2000 directive regarding student-athletes who
engage in academic fraud under NCAA Bylaw 10.1 (Unethical Conduct). Specifically, the committee directed
the staff not to reinstate student-athletes in cases involving academic
fraud. The committee noted that although this was a serious reinstatement
decision, these types of violations should be dealt with harshly, and the
committee was available to provide relief, if appropriate. |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
|
Accepted
the information. |
|
|
3. |
ISSUE: |
Withholding Condition Directive for Sports that Utilize
Dates of Competition and Maximum Contest Limitations.
|
|
Committee Action: |
||
|
|
NCAA
contest limitation legislation permits certain sports (e.g., soccer, field
hockey) to engage in a maximum number of dates of competition during the
nontraditional season and a maximum number of contests during the championship
season. Such legislation
provides institutions with greater flexibility since an institution could
engage in several contests on a specific date during the nontraditional
season. The staff requested
clarification from the committee on what the appropriate reinstatement
condition is for student-athletes who engage in multiple contests on a single
date during the nontraditional season.
The committee directed the staff to count each permissible date of
competition as one contest.
Thus, a student-athlete who competed in four contests on two dates of
competition would be reinstated after being withheld from the next two
regular-season contests during the championship or traditional season since
reinstatement conditions may only be fulfilled during the championship
season. |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
|
Accepted
the information. |
|
|
4. |
ISSUE: |
Applying Withholding Condition for
Team/Individual Sports. |
|
Committee Action: |
||
|
|
The committee reviewed a proposal put forward by
the staff to amend the policies regarding the application of a withholding
condition to state the following: [The
competition must be a regular-season competition (i.e., used to calculate the
Rating Percentage Index for postseason competition in the sport), which does
not include The staff reported on discussions with the championships
staff in an effort to develop a better understanding of the distinctions
between individual and team championships and the selection process for
both. Although sports vary in exactly
which events are considered in each individual and team championships
selection process, the number of individual events is limited under Bylaw 17
(Playing and Practice Seasons), and events are identified and scheduled as
team competitions with team scoring that counts toward team championship
consideration. The team
competitions appear to be most similar to the contests considered regularly
scheduled for all team sport participants and have less flexibility in scheduling. For
purposes of fulfilling a reinstatement condition, the committee determined
that the competition must be regular-season competition during the championship
segment, and the contests must be considered when the team is evaluated for
championship selection. The
committees also decided to send the report to the sport committees requesting
feedback. |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
|
Accepted
the information. |
|
|
5. |
ISSUE: |
Reinstatement Requests Involving Bylaw 14.01.3 (Compliance
with Other NCAA and Conference Legislation). |
|
Committee Action: |
||
|
|
There
are two categories of cases processed involving Bylaw 14.01.3: a. The first category concerns the
certification process where a student-athlete competes and would be
considered otherwise eligible, but the institution or conference certification
process was not completed, the student-athlete was not included on the eligibility
roster or squad list, or forms were not completed. The staff has reinstated those student-athletes within
this category of violation without condition because the institution/conference
failed to complete the necessary paperwork, but the student-athlete was
otherwise eligible. b. The second category concerns those circumstances
where a student-athlete does not meet an institutional or conference
regulation, which results in the student-athlete being ineligible for
competition. In this category,
the staff has withheld student-athletes on a one-for-one basis or noted the
use of a season if the student-athlete competed in less than 50 percent of
the season. The committee discussed the
reinstatement conditions and confirmed that the staff is applying the
appropriate withholding condition for violations of Bylaw 14.01.3 (Compliance
with Other NCAA and Conference Legislation). |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
|
Accepted
the information. |
|
The
National Collegiate Athletic Association
April 15,
2002
BB/DTD:skt