NCAA COMMITTEE ON WOMEN'S ATHLETICS (CWA)
1. LEGISLATIVE ACTION ITEMS.
Association-wide.
a.
NCAA
Woman of the Year (WOTY) Selection Committee.
(1)
Recommendation. Amend NCAA Bylaw 21.1.10.2
(Duties) to expand the duties of CWA to include the appointment and oversight
of the WOTY Selection Committee and process and to also include composition
requirements of the selection committee.
(2)
Rationale. WOTY winners are selected
annually by the CWA and the WOTY selection committee. The selection committee has existed for many years, but has never
been recognized as a formal duty of CWA.
The selection committee?s role is to review nomination forms and select,
with oversight from the CWA, the WOTY 51 state winners (including the District
of Columbia) and the 10 finalists. The
CWA then selects the WOTY from the 10 finalists. The amendment of the duties of CWA along with the inclusion of
composition requirements will formalize the process:
(a)
The
WOTY Selection Committee shall report to and be appointed by the CWA.
(b)
The
selection committee shall be a nine-member, Association-wide committee
including a minimum of two members from each division, one member from a
conference office, one member who also serves on the CWA, one former WOTY
finalist or student-athlete, and one representative from the Minority
Opportunities and Interest Committee or a historically black college or
university.
(c)
Each
committee member shall serve a three-year term.
These
parameters are consistent with the current procedures and structure of the
non-legislated duties of the committee.
This change will also benefit the ongoing work by formalizing the
process for identifying and appointing members. It will permit openings on the committee to be publicized among
all NCAA members.
(3)
Budget Impact. Costs incurred by this
committee include conference calls and related mailings. This committee does not meet in person. This committee has been functioning for
years, so no additional budget impact will occur.
Division I only.
b.
NACWAA Softball Tournament Exemption.
(1) Recommendation. Sponsor legislation in Division I, to exempt
participation in the National Association of Collegiate Women Athletic
Administrators (NACWAA) softball tournament from counting against an
institution?s maximum number of dates of competition in women?s softball.
(2) Rationale. The NACWAA softball tournament is a preseason event designed to
provide national exposure for Division I softball and benefit NACWAA. It will be a showcase event for women?s
softball, much like preseason events in other sports. This event is similar to others that receive exemptions from the
contest limitations in other sports.
(3) Budget Impact. None.
(4) Demand on Student-Athletes? Time: The event will be conducted over a weekend
with four Division I softball teams.
Student-athletes who participate would potentially miss one day of class
on Friday.
2. NON-LEGISLATIVE
ACTION ITEMS.
Association-wide.
a. MET-Rx College Football
Preview.
(1) Recommendation. That the three Management Councils, Boards
of Directors and the Executive Committee endorse the following statement: ?The NCAA discourages member institutions
and its student-athletes from participating in events and/or awards programs
sponsored or supported by organizations that portray women in a degrading
and demeaning manner (e.g., the Playboy Top 20, the Playboy All-America Team,
and the MET-Rx College Football Preview).?
(2) Rationale. The committee deplores the
practice of honoring student-athletes with awards provided by entities that
portray women in a degrading and demeaning manner (e.g., Playboy).
Specifically, the Playboy enterprise is demeaning to women and supports
gambling on college athletics. Further,
the committee believes MET-Rx College Football Preview Award?s association with
Playboy is not consistent with the values of the NCAA and the stated mission
and philosophies of the membership divisions.
Finally, the committee believes that Playboy and other entities are
exploiting student-athletes by providing such awards and encourages member
institutions and their student-athletes not to participate in these types of
events.
(3) Budget Impact. None.
b. Coaching Academy
?Pilot.?
(1) Recommendation. Approve a coaching academy two-year pilot
program whose purpose is helping to train, mentor, develop and retain female
college coaches, including the reallocation of $50,000 from an existing
diversity initiative in the 2002-03 budget to support the pilot program.
(2) Rationale. The 2002-03 budget contains $50,000
allocated to train and develop female and minority officials. Due to unforeseen circumstances, the
initiatives development will need to be delayed until 2003-04, leaving the
$50,000 unused for the 2002-03 budget year.
The committee recommends that the Management Councils approve
reallocation of these monies to provide for the development of a pilot coaching
academy for female coaches. The committee would like to provide these funds to ?Play
with Purpose.? This organization will
develop the core curriculum for the academy and provide a pilot program for
approximately 20 female college coaches in summer
2003 and summer 2004. The committee
would require the grant recipient to provide significant resources towards
providing scholarships for participants and to work closely with the
committee?s outreach subcommittee as the coaches academy unfolds. The committee would require that the academy
include diverse enrollment, including coaches of many different sports from all divisions.
(3) Budget Impact. None.
3. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS.
Association-wide.
a. Secretary?s
Commission on Opportunity in Athletics. The committee
received an update from the national office senior woman administrator on the
Secretary of Education?s Commission on Opportunity in Athletics. The committee noted that the commission?s
report was issued in late February.
b. President Brand. The committee met with NCAA President Myles Brand. Topics included Title IX and the ongoing
work of the commission, NCAA strategic planning efforts, senior leadership at
the national office and academic reform initiatives in Division I. President Brand encouraged the committee to
provide input on the NCAA strategic planning initiative currently underway.
c. NCAA
National Office Gender-Equity Plan.
It was noted that the national office gender equity plan is
in the final stages of review by national office senior leadership.
d. Strategic
Planning. The committee worked on updating its
strategic plan in preparation for the budget planning process later this
year. The following items were identified as top priorities for the next budget
cycle: (1) Title IX Initiatives; (2)
Programs focusing on professional development and retention of women coaches;
(3) Programs to increase sport participation among girls, including ethnic
minority girls; (4) NACWAA/Higher Education Resource Services (HERS); (5)
Programs focusing on professional development and retention of women officials;
and (6) NCAA Internships.
e. Use
of the Term ?Sportsmanship.? The committee reviewed a request from the Committee on
Sportsmanship and Ethical Conduct regarding use of the term
?sportsmanship.? The committee
determined that the term ?sportsmanship? is gender-neutral and is not
recommending a change in language at this time.
f. Woman
of the Year (WOTY) Dinner. The
committee received an update on the WOTY dinner from NCAA staff members Jan
Gentry and Lisa Turner. Committee members were reminded that current selection
policies allow institutions to nominate two student-athletes if one is an
ethnic minority.
g. NCAA Title IX Seminar. The committee received an update on the 2003
Title IX seminar to be conducted April 28-29 in San Diego, California.
h. Promotion of Women?s Sports. The committee met with members of the
national office branding, broadcasting and promotions staff to review
activities related to the promotion of women?s sports.
i.
President?s Summit on Sexual
Violence on Campus. The
committee reviewed an invitation for NCAA participation in the President?s
Summit on Sexual Violence on Campus and suggested the program be reviewed by
the student-athlete advisory committees for potential inclusion in leadership
conference programming.
Committee Chair:
Marilyn McNeil, Monmouth University, Northeast Conference
Staff Liaison(s): Julie Cromer, Membership Services; Diane
Dickman, Membership Services; Rosie Stallman, Education Services.