REPORT OF THE

NCAA DIVISION III ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE

                                                                                   

DIVISION III MANAGEMENT COUNCIL

 

 

1.                  ACTION ITEM.

 

a.         Policies and Procedures. 

 

(1)               Recommendation.  Approve the subcommittee's amended policies and procedures. [Attachment]  The subcommittee clarified the following issues:  (a) permitting the chair to determine that the subcommittee may reconsider a request even if the new information standard is not met; and (b) in cases where assertions are made regarding another member institution or conference as a basis for relief, that party shall be provided all materials and an opportunity to respond in writing within ten business days.

 

(2)               Rationale.  The subcommittee has reviewed various cases over the past year that have resulted in necessary clarifications of the policies and procedures in order to assist the membership, the subcommittee and the staff in the administrative review process.

 

(3)               Budget Impact.  None.

 

 

2.                  INFORMATIONAL ITEMS.

 

a.         Review of Staff Decisions, Subcommittee Decisions and Reconsideration Requests.  The subcommittee reviewed the cases that were staff denied and appealed to the subcommittee and reconsideration requests decided by either the staff or the subcommittee from September 2, 2002, through August 31, 2003.  The subcommittee noted that 24 cases denied by the staff were appealed to the subcommittee.  The subcommittee noted that there was one staff-granted case, four subcommittee-granted cases and 19 subcommittee-denied cases (four of which were denied on appeal).  There were no cases for reconsideration during this time period, and none of these cases were appealed. 

 

The subcommittee approved the staff to decide cases even in the absence of case precedent.  The subcommittee noted that staff may forward cases when it cannot reach a consensus on an issue; however, it is expected that the number of forwarded cases will decrease.  The subcommittee indicated that cases with national significance should be forwarded to the subcommittee.  Lastly, the subcommittee noted that it will review staff decisions on a periodic basis and may archive staff decisions it does not support. 

 

b.         Information Standards for Transfer Requests Involving Assertions of Misinformation.  The subcommittee reviewed the case precedent and affirmed the continued application of the October 1999 information standards in cases involving assertions of misinformation.  The subcommittee also affirmed that the staff should continue to include consideration of other factors especially the student-athlete’s academic record.  The subcommittee reviewed whether relief is appropriate for circumstances when the sources of academic misinformation are coaching staff members from a two-year institution, an NCAA institution or an NAIA institution.

 

The subcommittee approved the following guidelines in regards to assertions of misinformation:

 

(1)        In cases in which the misinformation provided by the previous four-year institution led to the student-athlete being ineligible and applicant institution can document that the student-athlete would have been eligible had he/she attended applicant institution directly, relief should be provided (e.g., 2-4-4 transfer). 

 

(2)        In cases in which the student-athlete relied in good faith on the academic misinformation and had correct information been provided, it was determined that the student-athlete could have met the necessary transfer requirements, and but for the misinformation, he or she could have been eligible, relief should be provided. 

 

(3)        In situations involving misinformation, if the student-athlete is not eligible at any Division III institution, then regardless of the misinformation received, the request should be denied provided the request for relief is solely based on the misinformation. 

 

In cases where the misinformation cannot be documented and absent other extenuating circumstances, the subcommittee directed the staff to deny these cases.

 

c.         Standards for Transfer Requests Involving Assertions of Academic and Athletics Reasons.   The subcommittee reviewed case precedent and affirmed the continued application of the October 2000 academic and athletics directives regarding transfer-waiver requests.  However, the subcommittee directed the staff to


continue to review requests on a case-by-case basis for extenuating circumstances, which may warrant relief from the transfer legislation. 

 

d.         Information Standards for Transfer Requests Involving Financial Hardship and Injury or Illness.  The subcommittee reviewed case precedent and affirmed the October 2000 information standards for assertions of financial hardship and the directive to deny requests involving a transfer for financial reasons in which the documentation is not provided to meet the information standards.  The subcommittee noted that when a student-athlete’s transfer is a result of specific event causing a financial hardship and supporting objective documentation is provided, relief from the transfer year in residence may be considered. 

 

The subcommittee reviewed case precedent and affirmed the October 1999 information standards for assertions of injury or illness.  The subcommittee also approved the following guidelines:

 

(1)        If the institution is unable to provide documentation to substantiate the injury or illness, the case should be denied.

 

(2)        If the institution does provide documentation substantiating the injury or illness and injury and the injury or illness necessitated the transfer, the case should be granted.

 

(3)        If the institution provides documentation substantiating an injury or illness, but the injury or illness is ancillary to the facts and thus does not relate to the need to transfer, the case should be denied.

 

e.         Minimum-Amount-of-Competition/Seasons-of-Competition Waiver —
Competition While Eligible.
  The subcommittee noted that from January 1, 2002, through July 31, 2003, the subcommittee processed 15 cases.  [Note: For competition occurring after August 1 the requests will be processed under the season-of-competition waiver and thus administered by the NCAA Division III Student-Athlete Reinstatement Committee.]  Of the 15 cases processed, six were granted with conditions, and nine were denied.  All six cases granted did not meet the established criteria of the waiver, but were granted based on the extraordinary circumstances. 

 

 

Subcommittee Chair:  William Eng, Bernard M. Baruch College

Staff Liaisons:   Julie Roe, Laura M. Wurtz, Student-Athlete Reinstatement