|
Proposal No and Title |
Sponsor |
TENTATIVE SPEAKER ASSIGNMENT |
LIAISON
ASSIGNMENTS/ |
POSITION |
|
2-1 DIVISION III MEMBERSHIP --
MAXIMUM CAPACITY |
|
MC: Strockbine PC: Fry |
Nilsson |
MC: Membership Committee: The
committee took no position in establishing a maximum size of the Division III
membership. The committee noted
the importance of the full membership deciding the outcome of this significant
legislative proposal. |
|
2-2 DIVISION III MEMBERSHIP AND
CHAMPIONSHIPS SELECTION -- MEMBER CONFERENCE -- SELF-STUDY GUIDE AND LIMITED
REALIGNMENT PERIOD |
NCAA Division III
Presidents Council (Future of Division III Phase II Oversight Group). |
MC: Resch PC: Knobel |
Peal |
|
|
2-3 INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL --
SELF-STUDY REPORT -- FAILURE TO SUBMIT |
NCAA Division III
Presidents Council [Management Council (Membership Committee)]. |
MC: Strockbine PC: Nelson |
Nilsson |
|
|
2-4 ETHICAL CONDUCT --
UNETHICAL CONDUCT -- PRESCRIPTION DRUGS |
NCAA Division III
Presidents Council (Management Council). |
MC: Braaten PC: Nelson |
Nilsson |
|
|
2-5 PERSONNEL -- LIMITATIONS ON
SCOUTING OF OPPONENTS -- EXHIBITION CONTESTS |
|
MC: Whitley PC: Flynn |
Nilsson |
MC: ILC: The committee
supported this proposal which intends to permit Division III coaches to
attend exhibition contests. The
committee noted the scouting legislation prohibited coaches from attending
unique exhibition contests scheduled in the sport of basketball against an
NCAA Division I or II institution.
The scouting prohibition should not apply to exhibition contests as
coaches should not be pre-vented from attending popular, often
well-publicized, early or preseason exhibition contests. |
|
2-6 AMATEURISM -- PROMOTIONAL
ACTIVITIES |
NCAA Division III
Management Council (Endorsements/Promotions Task Force). |
MC: Gleason PC: Wells |
Banker |
|
|
2-7 RECRUITING -- OFFICIAL
VISITS -- MEAL LOCATION |
NCAA Division III
Presidents Council [Management Council (Interpretations and Legislation
Committee)]. |
MC: PC: Berman |
Nilsson |
|
|
2-8 RECRUITING -- TRYOUTS --
COMPETITION AGAINST PROSPECTIVE STUDENT-ATHLETES |
NCAA Division III
Presidents Council [Management Council (Interpretations and Legislation
Committee)]. |
MC: Slabik PC: |
Banker |
|
|
2-9 RECRUITING -- TRYOUTS --
EXCEPTION |
NCAA Division III
Presidents Council [Management Council (Interpretations and Legislation
Committee)]. |
MC: Slabik PC: O'Brien |
Banker |
|
|
2-10 RECRUITING -- PROHIBITED
EXPENSES -- DONATION OF USED ATHLETICS EQUIPMENT |
NCAA Division III
Presidents Council [Management Council (Interpretations and Legislation
Committee)]. |
MC: Wong PC: Carter |
Nilsson |
|
|
2-11 ELIGIBILITY -- GRADUATE
STUDENT/POSTBACCALAUREATE PARTICIPATION -- EXCEPTION |
NCAA Division III
Management Council (Administrative Review Subcommittee). |
MC: Cushman PC: |
Banker |
|
|
2-12 ELIGIBILITY -- SEASONS OF
COMPETITION |
Massachusetts State College
Athletic Conference, Keene State College, Plymouth State College, Rhode
Island College and University of Southern Maine. |
MC: Cushman PC: Torgerson |
Nilsson |
MC: ILC: The committee
supported this membership proposal that intends to eliminate the
seasons-of-participation rule in favor of using a season-of-competition
standard. The committee discussed
the merits of this proposal and identified the student-athlete’s
well-being component and a student-athlete’s ability to participate in
practice as an important form of participation and should not be curtailed by
the season-of-participation standard. |
|
2-13 ELIGIBILITY -- SEASONS OF
PARTICIPATION -- PARTICIPATION AT ANY COLLEGIATE INSTITUTION |
|
MC: Dowd PC: Moseley |
Nilsson |
MC: ILC: The committee opposed
this proposal which intends to charge student-athletes in non-NCAA Division
III institutions with seasons of participation if the student-athlete
practices beyond his or her first opportunity to compete. The committee agreed that the Division
III season-of-participation standard should not implicate the use of Division
III seasons for a student-athlete that is participating in a non-NCAA
Division III institution. |
|
2-14 ELIGIBILITY -- TRANSFER
RESIDENCE REQUIREMENT -- CHAMPIONSHIP ELIGIBILITY |
NCAA Division III
Management Council (Interpretations and Legislation Committee). |
MC: Whitley PC: Williams |
Banker |
|
|
2-15 FINANCIAL AID -- FAILURE TO
SUBMIT ANNUAL ELECTRONIC REPORT -- APPLICATION OF RESTRICTED MEMBERSHIP
STATUS |
NCAA Division III
Presidents Council [Management Council (Membership Committee)]. |
MC: McHugh PC: Mosley |
Peal |
|
|
2-16 AWARDS AND BENEFITS --
BENEFITS, GIFTS AND SERVICES -- PERMISSIBLE -- OCCASIONAL MEALS |
NCAA Division III
Presidents Council [Management Council (Interpretations and Legislation
Committee)]. |
MC: Epps PC: O’Brien |
Nilsson |
|
|
2-17 PLAYING AND PRACTICE
SEASONS -- EXCEPTION TO PLAYING SEASON LIMITATIONS AND CONTEST EXEMPTION --
POSTSEASON CHAMPIONSHIP EVENT |
|
MC: Epps PC: Berman |
Nilsson |
MC: P&P: The subcommittee
noted this proposal is a reasonable accommodation for excluding one week from
the declared playing season for participation in a post-season event. Further, the subcommittee noted this
proposal could assist with the challenges related to championships access and
the growth of the division. |
|
2-18 PLAYING AND PRACTICE
SEASONS -- NONTRADITIONAL SEGMENT LENGTH AND MAXIMUM CONTEST LIMITATIONS |
Massachusetts State College
Athletic Conference, Keene State College, Plymouth State College, Rhode Island
College and University of Southern Maine. |
MC: Resch PC: Knobel |
Nilsson |
MC: Recommended that the
Presidents Council oppose the proposal. P&P: The subcommittee
noted this proposal expands the nontraditional playing season and conflicts
with the spirit of the 2004 reform agenda that, in part, emphasized a
reduction in the nontraditional segment. |
|
2-19 PLAYING AND PRACTICE
SEASONS -- FIRST CONTEST AND PRACTICE DATE -- FOOTBALL |
|
MC: Gleason PC: Carter |
Nilsson |
MC: Recommended that the
Presidents Council support the proposal. P&P: The subcommittee
noted this proposal provides limited scheduling flexibility for institutions
sponsoring football without increasing the overall length of the playing and
practice season. Specifically,
the subcommittee noted that this proposal does
not move back the first permissible practice date in August. |
|
2-20 PLAYING AND PRACTICE
SEASONS -- MAXIMUM CONTEST LIMITATIONS -- LACROSSE |
Empire 8 |
MC: Yowell PC: |
Nilsson |
MC: Recommended that the
Presidents Council support the proposal. P&P: A review of the
legislative history established that the maximum contest limitation in
lacrosse was intended to be 17 dates of competition in addition to one date
of competition in the nontraditional segment. The current language was established
at a time when several sports were undergoing maximum contest revisions which
permit the additional date of competition during the nontraditional segment. This change supports the consistent
treatment of all sports in Division III. |
|
2-21 DIVISION III MEMBERSHIP --
PHILOSOPHY STATEMENT -- INTEGRATION OF ADMINISTRATION -- ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE
-- ADMISSION POLICIES |
NCAA Division III
Presidents Council (Future of Division III Phase II Oversight Group). |
MC: Hastad PC: Fry |
Nilsson |
|
|
2-22 DIVISION III MEMBERSHIP --
PHILOSOPHY STATEMENT -- ELIMINATION OF IN-REGION COMPETITION EMPHASIS |
College Conference of |
MC: Hastad PC: Pride |
Williams/Fagan/Krah |
MC: Membership Committee: The
committee noted its support for the elimination of the in-region competition emphasis in the philosophy statement and
championships selection principles.
The committee supported
institutional autonomy in scheduling athletics contests. Champs: Oppose elimination
of emphasis on in-region competition during the selection process for all
Division III team sports. The
committee supports the Division III philosophy statement as written, and as
such, continues to affirm placing emphasis on in-region competition for
changes selection purposes. The
committee believes the 200-mile radius, as well [out of regional contests
during institutional breaks] both add appropriate flexibility to the
in-region concept. The committee
does encourage institutions to provide educational experiences in the form of
out-of-region trips for their student-athletes if they so choose, with the
understanding that they are doing it for the experience and not for selection
purposes. |
|
2-23 DIVISION III MEMBERSHIP --
ACTIVE MEMBERSHIP -- SPORTS SPONSORSHIP REQUIREMENT |
|
MC: Braaten PC: Williams |
Peal |
MC: Membership Committee: The
committee noted its opposition for the sports sponsorship requirement based
on institutional enrollment, preferring instead the sports sponsorship
proposal sponsored by the Presidents Council. |
|
2-24 DIVISION III MEMBERSHIP --
ACTIVE MEMBERSHIP -- SPORTS SPONSORSHIP REQUIREMENT -- SIX SPORTS FOR
MALES/MIXED AND FEMALE TEAMS |
NCAA Division III
Presidents Council [Management Council (Membership Committee)]. |
MC: Yowell PC: Flynn |
Nilsson |
|
|
2-25 DIVISION III MEMBERSHIP --
SPORTS SPONSORSHIP -- MINIMUM CONTEST REQUIREMENTS |
NCAA Division III
Presidents Council [Management Council (Membership Committee)]. |
MC: Strockbine PC: Wells |
Peal |
|
|
2-26 EXECUTIVE REGULATIONS --
AUTOMATIC QUALIFICATION -- CONFERENCE REALIGNMENT PERIOD |
|
MC: Wong PC: Pride |
Williams/Fagan/Krah |
MC: Champs: Oppose the proposed
conference realignment period.
The committee supports the principles of the proposal and recommends
that the conference or Council amend the effective date to allow a two-year
period for a conference self-study program, followed by realignment consistent with the related
governance-structure proposal. |
|
2-27 EXECUTIVE REGULATIONS --
SELECTION OF TEAMS AND INDIVIDUALS FOR CHAMPIONSHIPS PARTICIPATION --
AUTOMATIC QUALIFICATION -- SEVEN INSTITUTION REQUIREMENT -- TWO-YEAR GRACE
PERIOD |
Empire 8 |
MC: Yowell PC: Carter |
Williams/Fagan/Krah |
MC: Champs: Oppose allowing a
conference to remain eligible for automatic qualification for two academic
years after the date of withdrawal of the institution(s) that cause the
conference’s membership to fall below seven institutions in a
particular sport. The committee does not support the recommended unlimited
timeline of the grace period noting that it could perpetrate constant
fluctuation in the allocation of pools A, B and C. This concept is contrary to the
governance proposal that includes a period for conference self-study and a
limited period for conference realignment. |
|
2-28 EXECUTIVE REGULATIONS --
SELECTION OF TEAMS AND INDIVIDUALS FOR CHAMPIONSHIPS PARTICIPATION -- MAXIMUM
SIZE OF CHAMPIONSHIPS FIELDS |
NCAA Division III
Presidents Council (Future of Division III Phase II Oversight Group). |
MC: McHugh PC: |
Williams/Fagan/Krah |
|
|
2-29 EXECUTIVE REGULATIONS --
SELECTION OF TEAMS AND INDIVIDUALS FOR CHAMPIONSHIPS PARTICIPATION -- PRIMARY
CRITERIA -- RANKING AND SELECTION -- STRENGTH-OF-SEASON INDEX |
|
MC: Dowd PC:Williams |
Williams/Fagan/Krah |
MC: Champs: Oppose adoption of
a strength-of-season index as a primary
criterion for ranking and selection purposes in team sports. The committee has requested feedback
from all team sport committees regarding implementation of opponents’
average winning percentage as a primary criterion for ranking and selection
purposes, and believes that will result in a truer comparison of
strength-of-schedule between two institutions. The committee noted that
opponents’ average winning percentages can be used as a comparison
among any and all institutions, including independent institutions. |