REPORT OF THE

NCAA DIVISION III CHAMPIONSHIPS COMMITTEE

 

 

1.         ACTION ITEMS.

 

a.         Committee Composition – Men’s Lacrosse.

 

(1)        Recommendation.  Amend NCAA Bylaw 21.8.7.14 to state that the composition of the NCAA Division III Men’s Lacrosse Committee be designated as two members from the North Region and two members from the South Region.  Two representatives serving on the committee shall be administrators and two shall be coaches.

 

(2)        Rationale.  The amendment will ensure equal regional representation for championship selections and the administration of the championship.

 

(3)               Budget Impact.  None

 

b.                  NCAA Bylaw 31.1.4.1 - Institutional Policy – Religious Reasons.

 

(1)               Recommendation.  Eliminate NCAA Bylaw 31.1.4.1 that requires championship schedules to be adjusted to accommodate institutions with written policies against competition on a particular day for religious reasons.

 

(2)               Rationale.  The committee noted that with bracket expansion and an increased number of mid-week preliminary-round contests, it is essential to identify opportunities to eliminate missed class time.  In team sports that traditionally compete on Saturday/Sunday, institutions could possibly have a competition schedule of Wednesday/Friday/Saturday; teams may be required to travel on Tuesday for the Wednesday contest and then again on Thursday for the Friday contest.

 

The committee noted that NCAA Bylaw 31.1.4.4 [Noon Start Time] currently prohibits championship competition from starting prior to noon, local time, on Sundays, which allows for religious observation on Sunday mornings.

 

(3)               Budget Impact.  None.

 


c.                   Student-Athlete Championship Enhancements – 2005-06 Budget Reallocations.

 

(1)               Recommendation.  Adjust the 2005-06 championships program budget through reallocation to provide $110,000 for student-athlete championship enhancements ($5,000 for each of 22 championship final sites).

 

(2)        Rationale.  The committee has identified enhancing the student-athlete experience at championship finals sites as a priority and has collaborated with the Corporate and Broadcast Alliances Group (CBA) and sports committees to identify opportunities.  The intent is to create a menu of enhancement options that sports committees will be able to implement, based on individual needs of specific championships.

 

(3)        Budget Impact.  $110,000.

 

 

2.         INFORMATIONAL ITEMS.

 

a.                  Future of Division III – Phase II.  The committee forwarded recommendations to the Future of Division III – Phase II Oversight Group based on results of the membership survey, as well as feedback from the Forum at the 2005 NCAA Convention: 

 

(1)               Provide an option for member conferences to opt out of NCAA championships and participate in an alternative season-ending opportunity.

 

(2)               Determine if 64 is the ideal maximum for any championship bracket.

 

(3)               Adjust the current 1:6.5 team sport access ratio.

 

(4)               Provide a limited time period for conference realignment without loss of automatic qualification.

 

b.                  Swimming – 50-Meter Format.  The committee noted that student-athletes can qualify for the NCAA Division III Men’s and Women’s Swimming Championships from either a 25- or a 50-meter pool.


c.                   Host Institution Reimbursement.  The committee noted that the process for reimbursing host institutions for championship expenses in a timely and efficient manner is being handled internally by staff.

 

d.                  Medical Personnel Bench Passes.  The committee determined that all sports committees must provide up to two credentials for medical personnel that allows access to the bench area; these credentials should not be included as part of the official travel party.

 

e.                  Bench Party Size.  Reviewed the current policies of sports committees related to allowable bench party size and confirmed that this should remain under the purview of sports committees.

 

f.                    2006-08 Budget Initiatives.  The committee reviewed initiatives identified in September 2003 and confirmed the following budget priorities (not listed in priority order) to be reviewed and finalized during the committee’s June 2005 and September 2005 meetings:

 

·  &nb