REPORT OF THE
NCAA DIVISION III STUDENT-ATHLETE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
INFORMATIONAL ITEMS.
1. 2006 NCAA Convention Proposed Legislation.
a.
Proposal No.
1: Ethical Conduct – Sports
Wagering Activities. The committee voted to support this
proposal. This proposal establishes
consistency of expectation and sanction among all involved in the conduct and
oversight of athletics administration.
b.
Proposal No.
2: Personnel – Conduct of
Athletics Personnel – Sports Safety Training. The
committee voted to support this proposal.
Protecting the health and safety of the student-athlete is the
foundation of the establishment of the NCAA. This proposal reinforces the importance
of someone being physically present to address emergency medical issues. More importantly, it requires
institutions to examine and review emergency protocol to decrease response time.
c.
Proposal No.
3: Playing and Practice Seasons – Preseason Practice – Medical
Examinations. The committee voted to support this
proposal as it supports the annual health and safety of student-athletes.
d.
Proposal No.
4: Playing and Practice Seasons
– Nontraditional Segment – Limitations on Athletically Related Activity and Competition
Activity on the One Date of Competition. The committee voted to support this
proposal. By limiting the one date
of competition in the nontraditional season to eight hours, this proposal
protects the health and safety of student-athletes, offers an adequate window
of opportunity to compete as determined by the appropriate sports committees
and allows coaches the flexibility to observe players in a variety of game
situations.
e.
Proposal No.
5: Recruiting – Tryouts – Prohibited Activities – Tryout
Camps. The committee voted to support this
proposal. The committee believes
application of the rule should be consistent. If an institution is not permitted to
host a camp, clinic, group workout or combine event, an outside entity should
not be permitted to host the same.
The committee also noted that this legislation would level revenue
opportunities among Division III institutions.
f.
Proposal No.
6: Eligibility – General
Eligibility Requirements – Male Practice Player – Guidelines
(Amendment-to-Amendment). The committee voted to support this
proposal. Guidelines offered in
this proposal support the committee’s intent to limit the use of male
practice players to ensure female student-athletes are provided appropriate
practice opportunities.
g.
Proposal No.
6-1: Eligibility – General
Eligibility Requirements – Male Practice Player – Guidelines
(Amendment-to-Amendment). The committee voted to oppose the
amendment-to-amendment. In July,
the committee recommended legislation be sponsored to limit the use of male
practice players. The number of
players and frequency of use permitted in this amendment-to-amendment
contradicts the intent of the original recommendation.
h.
Proposal No.
7: Eligibility – Seasons of
Participation – Participation at Any Collegiate Institution. The
committee voted to oppose this proposal.
Student-athletes wishing to transfer from a Division I or II institution
to a Division III institution, should not be penalized a season of
participation.
i.
Proposal No.
8: Eligibility – Criteria for
Determining Season of Participation – Minimum Amount of Participation
– Nontraditional Segment. The committee voted to support this
proposal. Student-athletes should
not be charged a season of participation for practice in the nontraditional
segment.
j.
Proposal No.
9: Membership – Provisional
and Reclassifying Membership – Application Standards and Compliance with
Division Regulations. The committee voted to take no position
on this proposal. The committee understands
the intent of preparing provisional and reclassifying institutions for Division
III membership, but does not believe the more stringent regulations would make
a significant impact on student-athlete well-being.
k.
Proposal No.
10: Membership: Conditions And
Obligations Of Membership – Educational Initiatives. The
committee voted to support this proposal.
Funding resources exist in Division III to aid institutions in
compliance with this proposal.
Institutions also benefit because there is not an annual requirement for
institutions to comply with the Regional Rules Seminar attendance requirement and
more informed coaches and administrators can enhance the student-athlete
experience.
l.
Proposal No.
11: Division III Membership –
Maximum Capacity. The committee voted to oppose this proposal.
The membership continues the
discovery process toward a solution to membership growth. The current moratorium provides more
flexibility than a membership cap.
m.
Proposal No.
12: Legislative Process –
Amendment Process – Sponsorship Requirements. The
committee voted to support this proposal.
With the growth of the division, this proposal attempts to ensure that
legislation is focused on a larger majority of the membership and streamlines
the administrative management of legislation.
n.
Proposal No.
13: Ethical Conduct –
Gambling Activities – Sanctions – Timing Of Reinstatement Request. The
committee voted to support this proposal.
It not only provides institutions with more flexibility around filing a reinstatement
request but also allows student-athletes earlier access to athletically related
activities after the one-year penalty.
o.
Proposal No.
14: Playing and Practice Seasons
– Basketball – Annual Exemptions – Exhibition Contest and
Practice Scrimmages. The committee voted to support this
proposal. It provides institutions
with flexibility around scheduling exhibition contests but does not increase
the number of contests or length of season.
2.
Convention Panelists. SAAC
members will serve as panelists on four Division III and Association-wide 2007 NCAA
Convention sessions. Selected
individuals and topics are as follows:
a.
Division III
Issues Forum: Ethical Athletics
Administration. Heather Mathis.
b.
Division III
Issues Forum: Addressing Substance
Abuse and Use. Colleen McCullough.
c.
Division III
Issues Forum: The Changing Fan
Culture for Division III. Steven Suggs.
d.
Association-Wide
Session: Preliminary Findings from
the SCORE and GOALS Studies. Meghan Lockard.
3.
Recruiting Practices Ad Hoc Committee. The
committee met with Leah Nilsson to review the virtual focus group data on
recruiting practices. It voted to
form an Ad Hoc Committee to develop potential legislative models for Division
III recruiting practices. Heather
Mathis, Kayla Hinkley, Chris Wolf, Jessica Huntley, Emily Pankow and Kate
Schneider will serve on the Ad Hoc Committee. They plan to present potential models to
the SAAC in January and will provide final drafts for the Management Council’s
consideration in the committee’s January 2007 report.
4.
NCAA Executive Committee Working Group to Study
Membership Issues. The committee met with Ms. Nilsson to review the Executive
Committee Working Group’s potential recommendations designed to address
Division III membership issues. The
committee will gather feedback on the recommendations and provide a committee
position in its January 2007 report to the Management Council.
5. NCAA Division III SAAC Habitat for Humanity Campaign. The committee reviewed the completed tool kit designed to aide Division III institutions in organizing a Habitat for Humanity effort at their institution. The tool kit is a product of the committee’s division-wide community outreach initiative with Habitat. The committee’s goal is to engage 60 percent of the Division III membership in at least one Habitat service project in the next three semesters (September 2006 through December 2007) in any of the following areas: building, fundraising, advocacy and education. The tool kit is available on the NCAA Division III SAAC Web page.
6.
Conference and Campus SAAC Spotlight. The
committee selected the Old Dominion Athletic Conference and the
The Old Dominion Athletic Conference SAAC was
honored for recently completing its conference-wide community service project,
working together with its campus SAACs to collect canned goods during the third
annual
The
pursue higher education. UT-Tyler has also invited the middle
school students to attend volleyball and basketball games on campus, free of
charge. The grant will follow the
students through their senior year of high school and track the number that
attend college
7. SAAC Project Teams. The committee noted the following items:
a.
Conference SAAC/Independents. The committee is compiling
a list of each Division IIII conference’s commissioner, SAAC advisor and
SAAC chair in an effort to improve communication between the national and
conference SAACs. The committee
plans to complete the list by January and periodically update it as needed.
b.
SAAC Nominations. The project team announced the Nominating
Committee’s approval for SAAC to conduct telephone interviews with future
Division III SAAC candidates. It
also presented an interview outline and questions. The template will be forwarded to the
NCAA human resources department for approval and used to conduct the
interviews.
8.
Joint SAAC meeting. Divisions I, II and III met jointly
November 18. Prior to the meeting,
the committees participated in a professional development session on diversity
and inclusion with Wendy Walters, NCAA membership services staff.
During the meeting, committees shared divisional
updates and Association-wide committee reports. A significant discussion centered on
student-athlete time demands. SAAC
liaisons clarified each division’s bylaws regarding countable
athletically-related activities.
The committees participated in an exercise which explored how to count
athletically-related activities in each division by counting the hours spent on
athletically-related activities on a sample student-athlete schedule. The goal of the discussion was to
educate on current rules and empower them to share this information with their
peers. Todd Petr and Ann Kearns of
the NCAA research staff presented preliminary data from the Study of College
Outcomes and Recent Experiences (SCORE) and the Growth, Opportunities, Aspirations,
and Learning of Students in College (GOALS) reports. The data was an introduction to the
research staff’s efforts to monitor student-athlete time demands. Finally, NCAA SAAC liaisons facilitated
a discussion among the committees on how to initiate discussion about time
demands issues on campus and future steps to prepare for the 2008 Convention.
The committees also
received a report from Corey Steven, who attended the
educational
initiatives. The Think Tank hopes to include the committees in future
developments regarding the elimination of gender and sexual orientation bias.
9.
Committee Appointments. The committee selected
new representatives for the following committee vacancies:
a.
Management
Council Representative. Steven Suggs and Kayla Hinkley.
b.
Interpretations
and Legislation Committee. Ashley Snell.
c.
Championships
Committee. Emily Pankow.
d.
Olympic Sports
Liaison Committee. Christopher Wolf.
Committee Chair: Sameer
Khan,
Staff Liaison(s): Josh
Centor, NCAA Branding and Communications
Shana
Levine, NCAA Membership Services
Sarah
MacInnis, NCAA Education Services