REPORT OF THE
NCAA DIVISION III
MEMBERSHIP COMMITTEE
1. ACTION ITEMS.
a. Reclassification
Waiver Authority – NCAA Bylaw 20.6.2.3.
(1) Recommendation. Adopt noncontroversial legislation to
grant the NCAA Division III Membership Committee authority to waive years of
the four-year reclassification process when unique circumstances exist.
(2) Rationale. On review of the unique circumstances
surrounding an institution's
reclassification to Division III, the committee determined there are
some instances where relief of the four-year reclassification process may be warranted
(e.g., an institution applying Division III legislation for one full year prior
to making application to reclassify to Division III).
b. Reclassification
Request from
(1) Recommendation. That
(2) Rationale. During its review of
c. Legislative and
Policy Options for Institutions that do not Fully Meet Program Requirements
– NCAA Constitution 3.6.
(1) Recommendation. Adopt noncontroversial legislation to
grant the committee authority to place an institution in restricted membership
status for its first year of active membership. The committee will establish the parameters
of restricted membership to include loss of any or all of the following: championship access, voting privileges,
Division III grants and initiatives and catastrophic insurance.
(2) Rationale. Based on its review of the NCAA Division
III Management Council directive to explore future legislative and policy
options for institutions that do not fully meet program requirements, the
committee determined that a loss of championships access, voting privileges,
grants and insurance would be the most meaningful way to demonstrate concern over
an institution's active membership status.
The committee shall have the authority to select from the particular parameters
to best accommodate an institution's
d. Definitions of
Probation and Restricted Membership – Constitution 3.
(1) Recommendation. Adopt noncontroversial legislation to
add definitions of the terms "probation" and "restricted"
membership to the constitution.
(2) Rationale. The committee does not have an official
definition of the terms probation and restricted membership. It will be important to have official
definitions for these terms as the committee confers that status on institutions.
e. Championships Eligibility When
Pursuing Multidivision Classification – Bylaw 20.4.
(1) Recommendation. Adopt noncontroversial legislation to
specify an institution that has forwarded to the national office written notice
of its intention to reclassify a sport to Division I no longer shall be able to
participate in any future Division III championships for the affected sport.
(2) Rationale. There has not been a bylaw to describe
the championships eligibility of an institution that has forwarded to the
national office written notice of its intention to reclassify a sport to
Division I. The recommendation is
consistent with eligibility of an institution that has forwarded to the
national office written notice of its intention to reclassify it entire program
to Division II.
f. Review
Authority for Membership Waivers and Applications.
(1) Recommendation. Adopt noncontroversial legislation to
amend the review authority of membership waivers, as follows:
(a) Amend NCAA Constitution
3.2.4.12.5 (male-female enrollment ratio waiver) to specify that male-female
enrollment ratio waivers shall be submitted to the committee.
(b) Amend Constitution
3.2.5.1 (termination or suspension) to specify that the notice of intention to
suspend or terminate membership shall be given, in writing, to the NCAA
Executive Committee.
(c) Amend Constitution
3.6.4.2 (self-study and annual review) to specify that the provisional
institution's written report is to be reviewed by the committee with Management
Council approval.
(d) Amend NCAA Bylaws
20.4.2.1 (deadline for submission of approved form), 20.4.3.1 (deadline for submission
of approved form), 20.6.2.1 (reclassification to Division II – notification
requirement) and 20.6.2.2 (deadline for submission of approved form) to specify
that institutions shall notify the committee when petitioning for Division III
membership.
(2) Rationale. Several of the review authorities for
membership waivers and applications no longer exist in the Division III
structure or are no longer used in common practice. This proposal would specify more
appropriate review bodies for membership waivers and applications.
g. Failure to Comply
with the Institutional Self-Study Guide Deadline – Constitution 6.3.1.
(1) Recommendation.
Adopt noncontroversial legislation
to place institutions failing to comply with the NCAA Division III
Institutional Self-Study Guide (ISSG) deadline on probation. Further, if an institution does not
submit the ISSG Notification of Completion Form within one year of the original
deadline, that institution shall be placed in
restricted membership status.
(2) Rationale. After reviewing the list of 56 Division
III institutions that have failed to submit their ISSG Notification of
Completion Form by the deadline, the committee expressed a desire to strengthen
the meaning of the ISSG deadline. The institution would be notified of this
status with a deadline to submit the ISSG completion form. Repeated failure to submit the
completion would move the institution to restricted membership. The committee also noted that conference
commissioners would be copied on the institution’s correspondence related
to any late submission.
h. Tennis
- Minimum Number of Participants – Bylaw 20.11.3.3.
(1) Recommendation. Sponsor noncontroversial legislation to
increase the minimum number of participants in tennis to six.
(2) Rationale. The previous minimum number of
participants had been set at five participants, which is not enough participants
to complete a match. Six
participants is the minimum number to complete an NCAA
i. Failure to Submit Annual
Electronic Report – Bylaw 15.4.1.1.
(1) Recommendation. Sponsor legislation for the 2006 NCAA
Convention to specify that institutions failing to submit the annual financial
aid electronic report be moved to probation, restricted status and
corresponding membership on repeated failures of submission.
(2) Rationale.
On recommendation from the NCAA
Division III Financial Aid and Awards Committee, the committee determined that,
due to the importance of the report and its relationships to the Division III
philosophy, repeated failure to submit the annual electronic report should
result in a loss of Division III membership.
j. Waiver
of Minimum Contest Requirement – Bylaw 20.11.3.3.9.2.
(1) Recommendation. That Management Council deny
(2) Rationale. The committee noted that
2. INFORMATIONAL
ITEMS.
a. Acceleration
of the Provisional Membership Process.
The committee considered an acceleration mechanism for the
provisional and reclassifying membership program, noting that some institutions
may exhibit a readiness for Division III active membership more quickly than
other institutions. At this time,
the committee remains committed to a four-year provisional membership process
with no acceleration mechanism, as the program is designed to help an
institution adjust to operational practices and philosophical values of the
athletics department to align with the Division III philosophy statement and
that valuable activities occur in each of the four years of the provisional
membership program.
b. Provisional Member Attendance at Regional
Leadership Conference. The committee
recommended allowing years three and four provisional institutions the opportunity
to participate in the Student-Athlete Regional Leadership Conference within
their respective region and that provisional participants be eligible to
receive NCAA funding to attend the conference.
c. Future
of Division III Convention Forum Feedback. The committee reviewed the membership
comments from the 2005 NCAA Convention forum to provide feedback to the Joint Subcommittee
on the Future of Division III. The
committee identified the following items for the Oversight Committee to discuss
in more detail:
(1) Enable
Division III institutions to reclassify to Divisions I and II;
(2) Adjust
sports sponsorship requirements based on enrollment;
(3) Increase
minimum contest requirements for sports sponsorship;
(4) Increase
the minimum number of required student-athlete participants in individual
sports, if the sport is used to meet the minimum sports sponsorship requirements;
(5) Continue
to permit national dual membership affiliations;
(6) To
what extent are chief executive officers (CEO) involved in the oversight of
intercollegiate athletics;
(7) Better
incorporate the individual to whom the athletics director reports;
(8) Realignment
without loss of automatic qualification for a limited time period; and
(9) Creation
of a Conference Self-Study Guide.
d. NCAA Support of Administrator to Whom the
Athletics Director Reports. As shown in the Future of Division III –
Phase II survey responses, 48 percent of Division III athletics directors
report to an individual other than the CEO (e.g., chief academic affairs
officer, chief student affairs officer).
Based on the Division III reporting lines, the committee agreed to
include the administrator to whom the athletics director reports in its member
education program. To this end, the
committee will pursue the following initiatives:
(1) Providing an
opportunity for Convention grants;
(2) Expanding the
membership database to include the "top six;"
(3) Including the
appropriate reporting lines in the ISSG;
(4) NCAA staff presenting
information at the chief student affairs annual convention; and
(5) Providing NCAA
Convention programming.
e. ISSG Updates. The committee approved two questions related
to certification of insurance to be added to the Sports Medicine section of the
ISSG, as well as a membership education checklist.
f. Conference Orientation. The committee approved the conference
orientation concept and directed the NCAA staff to implement the orientation
program. The committee also asked
for feedback from the Division III Commissioner Association and will make the
program available to all conferences that have an interest.