|
|
RELATED TO |
Summary of Recommendations
ACTION ITEMS – MANAGEMENT
COUNCIL ONLY
|
1. ISSUE: |
Sports Committee Appointments. |
|
|
Committee Recommendation: |
||
|
|
Approve (a) Women’s Basketball – Jim Scheible,
coach at University of Rochester, East region; (b) Men’s Ice Hockey – Chris Brown,
coach at Marian College (Wisconsin), and Donald Maslinski, director of
athletics at St. Norbert College, West region; (c) Men’s Lacrosse – Peter Bothner,
director of athletics at Nazareth College, North region; (d) Women’s Softball – Margaret Knight,
coach at Salisbury University, Atlantic region; (e) Men’s and Women’s Tennis – Kathy
Campbell, coach at Vassar College, Northeast region; and (f) Women’s Basketball Rules – R |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
Previously approved August 29, 2002, by the Division III
Administrative Committee. |
||
|
2. ISSUE: |
Track and Field Rules Outdoor Track Survey. |
|
|
Committee Recommendation: |
||
|
|
Approve |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
Approved the recommendation. |
||
|
3. ISSUE: |
Pole-Vault Equipment – Landing Pad. |
|
|
Committee Recommendation: |
||
|
|
Approve |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
Approved the recommendation. |
||
|
4. ISSUE: |
Softball Rules Committee – Softball Coefficient of Restitution.
|
|
|
Committee Recommendation: |
||
|
|
Approve |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
Approved the recommendation. |
||
|
5. ISSUE: |
Basketball Rim Testing. |
|
|
Committee Recommendation: |
||
|
|
Deny |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
Approved the recommendation to deny and forwarded the matter to the
Association-wide playing rules oversight group, noting that the
recommendation does not have unanimous divisional support. |
||
|
6. ISSUE: |
Softball On-Site Administrator. |
|
|
Committee Recommendation: |
||
|
|
Deny
the recommendation to require host institutions to designate an on-site
administrator who is not a member of the coaching staff to assist umpires
with game management issues during regular-season competition. (An on-site administrator is still
required, but it can be a member of the coaching staff.) |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
Approved the recommendation to deny. |
||
|
7. ISSUE: |
North Atlantic Conference Wavier Request [NCAA Bylaw
31.3.4.2-(a)]. |
|
|
Committee Recommendation: |
||
|
|
Deny |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
Approved the recommendation to deny. |
||
|
8. ISSUE: |
Women’s Rowing – AQ Selection Process. |
|
|
Committee Recommendation: |
||
|
|
That
the New England Small College Athletic Conference (NESCAC) be awarded an automatic
qualification berth and that all remaining at-large berths (Pools B and C) be
collapsed into Pool B. All Pool
B institutions and remaining institutions from Pool A (NESCAC institutions)
will be eligible for all remaining at-large berths. |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
Approved the recommendation, noting that collapsing of Pool C into
Pool B is a one-time exception to the principles based on the unique
situation with sponsorship of Division III women's rowing. |
||
|
9. ISSUE: |
Women’s Softball – Championship Date Formula |
|
|
Committee Recommendation: |
||
|
|
Approve
that the championship date formula for the finals be moved back one day so
that competition begins Friday and ends either Monday or Tuesday (if an “if necessary”
game is required). The date
formula for the finals will be defined as the “weekend of the third Saturday
in May (Friday through Tuesday).” |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
Approved the recommendation. |
||
ITEMS OF INFORMATION
|
1. ISSUE: |
Team
Sport Selection Criteria. |
|
|
Committee Action: |
||
|
|
The
committee is in the process of developing revised team sport selection criteria, which would
incorporate a consistent strength-of-schedule index to be used by all team sports
with the exception of rowing.
The committee presented a draft document (Attachment A) for discussion with the chairs of all
team sports committees and will solicit their feedback on completion. Based on the positive feedback from
the chairs, implementation of these criteria is anticipated to take effect
with the 2003-04 academic year.
The committee will allow all sports committees to make use of the finalized index prior
to mandated implementation (2002-03 if so decided). |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
Accepted the information, noting a concern with awarding points for
losing to teams with losing records. |
||
|
2. ISSUE: |
NCAA
Division III Championships Host Manual. |
|
|
Committee Action: |
||
|
|
A
host manual for all Division III championships is in the developmental stages
and will be completed in time to be presented at the 2003 NCAA
Convention. This manual will be
used as a resource for all institutions and conferences that are interested
in placing a bid for a specific championship. |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
Accepted the information. |
||
|
3. ISSUE: |
Predetermined,
Multi-Year Same Site Selection. |
|
|
Committee Action: |
||
|
|
The
committee received numerous site-selection recommendations and agreed to
approve championship sites
only through the 2004-05 academic year. The committee discussed the benefits of rotating
championships to different locations of the country. It is the intent of the committee to
review site-selection criteria and develop policies regarding multi-year same
site hosting at its January 2003 meting. |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
Accepted the information. |
||
|
4. ISSUE: |
2001-02 Championships Financial Analysis. |
|
|
Committee Action: |
||
|
|
The committee
reviewed information relative to the financial analysis of the 2001-02
championships provided by the NCAA finance and information services staff The
committee has requested confirmation of actual cost savings attributed to
moving flight restrictions from 400 to 500 miles, as well as implementation of
the hub-airport travel policy.
In order to evaluate equity in the travel policy, the committee also
has requested that the NCAA finance staff provide data reflecting the
financial burden to institutions flying into airports within 50 miles
roundtrip of the championship site. The established policy states that
institutions traveling by air are responsible for ground transportation if
they fly into an airport that is less than 50 miles roundtrip from the
championship site. |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
Accepted the information. |
||
|
5. ISSUE: |
Baseball Committee –
Selection Principles. |
|
|
Committee Action: |
||
|
|
Reaffirmed the current
wording in the pairing procedures within the selection principle guidelines
(“Teams from the same conference do not have to play one another in the first
round as long as geographic proximity is maintained.”) and confirmed that the
baseball committee acted within its purview by placing higher importance on
seed rather than |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
Accepted the information. |
||
|
6. ISSUE: |
Men’s Basketball Committee –
Selection Criteria. |
|
|
Committee Action: |
||
|
|
Denied
the request to implement the men’s basketball committee’s proposed
strength-of-schedule index as the primary and secondary criteria for the 2003
championship. Implementation of
a consistent strength of schedule for all team sports, with the exception of
rowing, is anticipated for the 2003-04 academic year. Although the men’s basketball committee
put forward a legitimate proposal, the championships committee was not in
favor of approving an index that would be in use for one year only. The men’s basketball committee, as
well as all team sports committees, will have the opportunity to use the
proposed strength-of-schedule index during 2002-03. |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
Accepted the information. |
||
|
7. ISSUE: |
Women’s Basketball Committee
–Regional Realignments. |
|
|
Committee Action: |
||
|
|
(1) Approved realignment of the Presidents’
Athletic Conference (2) |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
Accepted the information. |
||
|
8. ISSUE: |
Football Committee – Future Host
Site/Selection Criteria. |
|
|
Committee Action: |
||
|
|
(1) Future Host Site. Denied the request to allow the
football committee to enter directly into negotiations with the city of Salem, Virginia and the Old Dominion Athletic
Conference for the right to co-host the championship finals of the 2004,
2005 and 2006 NCAA
Division III Football Championships.
The committee directed the football committee to solicit bids through
the established process and be prepared to recommend sites to the
championships committee by June 2003. (2)
Strength
of Schedule. Approved the request to eliminate opponent’s
opponents’ records as a criterion in determining strength of schedule. (3)
Bye
Teams. Denied the request to reevaluate the
championships committee’s decision regarding the pairing of teams,
specifically bye teams. (4) Seeding Procedure. Denied the request to include historical performance from the past three championships in the criteria for seeding teams in their respective seven-team brackets. |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
Accepted the information. |
||
|
9. ISSUE: |
Women’s Golf Committee –
Selection Criteria. |
|
|
Committee Action: |
||
|
|
(1) Selection Criteria
– Strength of Schedule.
Approved that the strength of schedule be redefined to include quality
of the field. Strength of
schedule would read as follows: “Quality of the field,
number of teams in tournaments and number of rounds in tournaments.” (2) Selection Criteria – Scoring
Average. Approved that scoring average be redefined to include team and
individual stroke average.
Scoring average would read as follows: “Adjusted
scoring average, team and individual stroke average, and score versus par.” (3) Selection Criteria – Tie-Breaking
Procedure. Approved that a
tie-breaking procedure be put in place.
In the event a tie exists, the committee would consider the selection
criteria in the following priority order: (a) head-to-head competition within regions; (b) won-lost
record (in region and overall); (c) comparisons with common opponents; (d)
scoring average (adjusted scoring average, team and individual stroke
average, and score versus par); (e) strength of schedule (quality of the
field, number of teams in tournaments and number of rounds of tournaments);
(f) spring results compared to fall results; and (g) eligibility and
availability of student-athletes. (4) Regional Assignment. Approved regional designation for Bates College Region
1 University of
California, Santa Cruz Region
5 Middlebury College
Region
1 College of Mount
St. Joseph Region
2 Nazareth College Region
1 Piedmont College
(provisional member) Region
2 Rose-Hulman
Institute of Technology Region
2 Susquehanna
University Region
1 Villa Julie
College Region
1 University of
Wisconsin, River Falls Region
3 Worcester State
College Region
1 |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
Accepted the information. |
||
|
10. ISSUE: |
Women’s Lacrosse Committee –
Officials. |
|
|
Committee Action: |
||
|
|
Approved the use of three flights |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
Accepted the information. |
||
|
11. ISSUE: |
Selected Individual-Team Sports (Cross Country, Golf,
Tennis) – Automatic Qualification Principles and Selection Process. |
|
|
Committee Action: |
||
|
|
After
its June proposal to the NCAA Division III M (1)
Suggested
elimination of individual portion of the championship; and (2)
Possible
effect of application of automatic qualification. The committee will evaluate
information received from each sports committee independently and will
present a revised proposal to the Management Council for each of the
championships under review. The
committee |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
||
|
Accepted the information. |
||
|
12. ISSUE: |
Regional Rankings.
|
|
|
Committee Action: |
||
|
| ||