|
|
RELATED TO |
NCAA DIVISION III PRESIDENTS
COUNCIL/MANAGEMENT COUNCIL
JOINT SUBCOMMITTEE ON
THE FUTURE OF DIVISION III
Summary
of Recommendations
PRESIDENTS
COUNCIL ACTION ITEMS
|
1.
ISSUE: |
January Membership Update. |
|
Management Council Recommendation: |
|
|
Review the January membership communication document, noting that it
needs to be updated based on the survey results and the focus group meetings. |
|
|
Presidents Council Action: |
|
|
|
|
|
2.
ISSUE: |
Survey Results. [Attachment A] |
|
Management Council Recommendation: |
|
|
Endorse the areas for referral to the
subgroups for their conference calls May 27-June 6. During its review of the survey results and
the potential issues for proposed legislation, the Council noted the opportunity
for the focus groups and subgroups to discuss the following items on which
the survey results indicate a consensus for proposed legislation, or
responses were closely divided. FINANCIAL AID SUBGROUP AREAS FOR DISCUSSION: n No consideration of athletics in award packaging, buttressed by
proposed annual audit and reporting process.
n Permit consideration of athletics in granting aid up to need
(?preferential packaging?). ELIGIBILITY AND RECRUITING SUBGROUP AREAS
FOR DISCUSSION: Academic Eligibility/Seasons
of Participation n Redefine eligibility limits to include practice or competition. A student-athlete would be limited to four
seasons of participation. Practice or
competition during a season would count as one of four available seasons. Athletics
Eligibility/Eligibility Clock n Final semester of
eligibility ? prevent enrollment in less than a full-time program of
studies. n Graduate
student/postbaccalaureate participation ? permit students in graduate or
postbaccalaureate programs with time remaining on their eligibility clock to
participate in intercollegiate athletics regardless of the institution
attended as an undergraduate. Recruiting n Establish a principle that
athletics recruitment should comply with established policies and procedures
applicable to the admissions process.
n Establish recruiting
?dead periods? in all sports. n Transfer contact rule ?
strengthen rule to preclude unsolicited contact and subsequent transfer and
enrollment. PLAYING AND PRACTICE SEASONS SUBGROUP AREAS FOR DISCUSSION: Traditional Segment ?
Length of Playing Season and Contest Limits n Modify and make more
consistent the length of playing seasons based on a student?s overall percentage
of time engaged in athletics. n Establish specific
start and end dates, which may be all-inclusive (i.e., preseason conditioning
through end of championships). n Establish reasonable
contest limits to minimize impact on missed class time. Nontraditional Segment n Consider further
limitation (e.g., fewer contests or practice only). MEMBERSHIP SUBGROUP AREAS FOR DISCUSSION: Sports Sponsorship n Increase the minimum
based on division-wide average of almost 16 total. Multidivision
Classification ? Sports Sponsorship Requirements n Eliminate multidivision
classification, i.e., require all sports to be sponsored in Division
III. Coaching, Travel and
Squad Limits n Coaching limits. Establish limits on number of permissible
coaches per sport, based on reasonable full-time equivalent ratio of
participants to coaches in each sport. n Travel and Squad
sizes. Establish travel and varsity
squad size limits. Membership
Structure n Establish membership subdivisions
within Division III to permit schools to further pursue legislative autonomy
while retaining core principles applicable to the entire division. The Council also recommended that the
membership subgroup discuss options through which member schools and
conferences might better exercise their legislative and policy making
autonomy. |
|
|
Presidents Council Action: |
|
|
|
|
|
3.
ISSUE: |
Future of Division III Timetable. |
|
Management Council Recommendation: |
|
|
Review the timetable, noting the scheduling
of the subgroup and oversight group conference calls, a CEO summit and
possible conference/regional gatherings in October/November. n The goal is for dialogue, discussion
and feedback from the mem-bership during the remainder of 2002 and throughout
2003. This will include discussions
at various conference and association meetings, as well as direct contact
with CEOs by members of the Presidents Council. n January 12 ? A membership forum
at the 2003 Convention. n February 3-7 ? Draft survey reviewed by the Oversight Group. n February 14 ? Survey/letter mailed to Division III CEOs with copies to ADs, FARs, SWAs, SAAC liaisons and commissioners, encouraging campus/conference dialogue before signature. n February 14 ? E-mail communication to solicit membership interest in participating in the April 22-23 in-person focus group meetings to be held in Indianapolis. n March 3 ? Reminder card/follow-up. n March 5 ?Mellon Foundation visit by the Division III leadership and governance staff. n March 7 ? Survey deadline. n March 7-31 ? Research staff compiles and evaluates survey results. n April 8 ? Oversight Group conference call to review survey results. n April 14 ? Guest editorial in The NCAA News to encourage CEO involvement. n April 14-15 ? Management Council
review. n April 22-23 ? Focus group in-person meetings in Indianapolis. n April 24 ? Presidents Council review. n Late April ? Executive summary of survey results mailed to Division III CEOs with companion memo to other interest groups. n May 29 ? Eligibility and Recruiting Subgroup conference call. n May 30 ? Playing and Practice Seasons Subgroup conference call. n May 30 ? Membership Subgroup conference call. n June 3 ? Championships Subgroup conference call. n June 6 ? Financial Aid Subgroup conference call. n June 18 ? Oversight Group conference call. n September ? CEO summit. n October/November ? Regional conference meetings of athletics administrators and student-athletes. n November ? Explanation of proposed legislation for 2004 Convention mailed to Division III CEOs. n Legislation will not be
considered until the 2004 Convention, at the earliest. n In addition, legislation will include a delayed effective date (e.g., August 2006) in order to give schools and conferences ample time to prepare for implementation at the institutional and conference levels. |
|
|
Presidents Council Action: |
|
|
|
|
ACTION
ITEMS ? MANAGEMENT COUNCIL ONLY
|
1.
ISSUE: |
Division III Forum Results. |
|
Management Council Action: |
|
|
Reviewed the Division III Forum results. |
|
|
2.
ISSUE: |
Focus Group Participants. [Attachment
B] |
|
Management Council Action: |
|
|
Reviewed the focus group selection process and
participant list, noting that there were 132 individuals nominated, 48 of
which were chosen. The Council also
noted the inclusion of its SAAC representatives to the April 17 telephone
focus group. Susan Bassett, Suzanne
Coffey and Steve Argo will be in Indianapolis April 22-23 to observe one or
more of the in-person focus groups.
Focus group discussions should clarify whether split support on some
survey items was resource based or philosophy based. |
|