|
|
RELATED TO |
NCAA DIVISION III STUDENT-ATHLETE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Summary of Recommendations
ACTION ITEMS ? MANAGEMENT
COUNCIL ONLY
|
1. ISSUE: |
Certification of
Student-Athlete Insurance Coverage. |
|
Committee Recommendation: |
|
|
Endorse the committee?s position of support for
the proposal from the Risk Management and Insurance Task Force that requires
member institutions to certify student-athlete insurance coverage. |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
|
|
Agreed to review legislative proposals related to risk management and
insurance task force reports at its July meeting. |
|
|
2. ISSUE: |
Finance of Insurance for
Injuries and Illness not Related to Practice or Competition. |
|
Committee Recommendation: |
|
|
Endorse the
committee?s position of opposition to the proposal from the Risk Management
and Insurance Task Force that would permit member institutions to provide
insurance to student-athletes for any illness or injury, regardless of
whether it occurs in the act of their roles as athletes. |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
|
|
Endorsed the committee?s position. |
|
ITEMS OF INFORMATION
|
1. ISSUE: |
New Member Orientation.
|
|
Committee Action: |
|
|
The
committee welcomed five new members:
Brad Coffey, Christina Gipson, Natalie Lyons, Dave Masilunas and Adam
Mohr. The new members participated in
an orientation session with the executive subcommittee and NCAA staff. |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
|
|
Accepted the information. |
|
|
2. ISSUE: |
Joint SAAC. |
|
Committee Action: |
|
|
The
committee referred the
following recommendations to the Joint SAAC at its January 11 meeting. American Indian Mascot Usage by Member
Institutions. The committee supports the Minority and
Opportunity Interests Committee?s recommendation opposing the use of American
Indian mascots by member institutions.
The committee believes the use of American Indian mascots definitely
could be considered offensive to American Indians and, therefore, should not
be used, especially in cases where the local tribes are against the usage. Purpose of Joint SAAC.
The committee supports the continued existence of a Joint SAAC, with
the possibility of minor adjustments.
Currently, the Joint SAAC is run by the communications team and
conducts meetings twice a year (January and July). The committee feels these meetings are productive and are a
good place to address issues that affect all student-athletes regardless of
division. However, the committee
noted that the Joint SAAC meetings may be better served to be run by the
chair and vice-chair of each division.
The committee agreed that the Joint SAAC meetings should include both
information and action items.
Further, the committee noted that the Joint SAAC should have an avenue
to report, possibly to President Myles Brand or the NCAA Executive Committee. |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
|
|
Accepted the information. |
|
|
3. ISSUE: |
Project Team Reports. |
|
Committee Action: |
|
|
The committee received oral reports
from project team representatives. It
was determined that the Amateurism Project Team should be eliminated. Julia Brown was named as chair of the
Community Service Project Team and Jami Goldman was named chair of the Regional
Leadership Conference Project Team. |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
|
|
Accepted the information. |
|
|
4. ISSUE: |
2003 Legislative Proposals. |
|
Committee Action: |
|
|
The committee reviewed its positions on the following
legislative proposals for the 2003 NCAA Convention: Proposal No. 40 ? playing and practice
seasons ? basketball ? first contest date. The committee
opposed the proposal. Proposal No. 41 ? playing and practice
seasons ? playing seasons regulations. The committee
opposed the proposal. Proposal No. 41-1 ? playing and
practice seasons ? playing seasons regulations.
The committee opposed the proposal. Proposal No. 42 ? executive regulations
? selection of teams for championships participation ? automatic
qualification. The committee supported the proposal. Proposal No. 43 ? executive regulations
? selection of teams and individuals for championships.
The committee opposed the proposal.
Proposal No. 44 ? amateurism ?
professional team ? definition. The
committee supported the proposal. Proposal No. 45 ? recruiting ?
definition of contact. The committee
supported the proposal. Proposal No. 46 ? recruiting ?
eligibility ramifications ? restitution for improper benefits. The committee supported the proposal. Proposal No. 47 ? recruiting ? de
minimus violations. The committee
supported the proposal. Proposal No. 48 ? eligibility ? seasons
of competition ? waiver. The
committee supported the proposal. Proposal No. 49 ? playing and practice
seasons ? noncollegiate, amateur competition ? basketball. The committee supported the proposal. Proposal No. 50 ? playing and practice
seasons ? number of contests - ice hockey.
The committee supported the proposal. Proposal No. 51 ? playing and practice
seasons ? tennis ? preseason practice.
The committee supported the proposal. Proposal No. 52 ? playing and practice
seasons ? indoor and outdoor track and field ? length of playing season. The committee supported the proposal. Proposal No. 53 ? National Collegiate
Championships ? women?s bowling. The
committee supported the proposal. Proposal No. 54 ? membership ? emerging
sports ? rugby. The committee supported
the proposal. |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
|
|
Accepted the information. |
|
|
5. ISSUE: |
Division III Student-Athlete Regional Leadership
Conference. |
|
Committee Action: |
|
|
The committee reviewed feedback from the Division III
Student-Athlete Regional Leadership Conference evaluations for the conference
held November 8-10, 2002, in Boston, Massachusetts. The committee will look to incorporate the suggestions at its
next conference January 31-February 2 in Minneapolis, Minnesota. |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
|
|
Accepted the information. |
|
|
6. ISSUE: |
Division III Issues. |
|
Committee Action: |
|
|
The committee will continue
to review athletically related activity time limitations through soliciting
feedback from other student-athletes and considering a specific weekly time
limitation that would be appropriate. |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
|
|
Accepted the information. |
|
|
7. ISSUE: |
Conflict of Interest Policy. |
|
Committee Action: |
|
|
The committee discussed whether SAAC
members who graduate from college and |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
|
|
Accepted the information. |
|
|
8. ISSUE: |
Division III SAAC Chronology of Work
Completed |
|
Committee Action: |
|
|
The committee reviewed a draft of the
SAAC chronology, which contains a complete history of the committee?s
achievements and initiatives. |
|
|
Management Council Action: |
|
|
Accepted the information. |
|