Executive Summary

The National Collegiate Athletic Association

Division III Chancellor/Presidents Advisory Group Meeting

August 2, 2006

 

 

President Ivory Nelson, chair for the Division III Presidents Council welcomed the members of the Chancellor/Presidents Advisory Group and Presidents Council and reviewed the Advisory Group roster noting those conferences that were represented by an alternate president.  [Attachment]

 

Overview of Advisory Group.  Dan Dutcher, vice-president for Division III noted that the
Advisory Group was established in response to the desire of the Division III Presidents Council to more directly and effectively engage presidents and chancellors in governance discussions at the national, conference and institutional levels. 

 

Objectives.

·                    Enhance the level of understanding in the NCAA governance process related to key
issues facing Division III.

·                    Enhance the leadership of chancellor/presidents in the governance of intercollegiate
athletics at the national, conference/independent and institutional levels with special
emphasis on key legislative proposals and policies and strategic direction.

·                    Enhance the integration of athletics programs within the educational mission of Division III schools and conferences.  Special emphasis placed on strategic initiatives implemented through the new Division III Strategic Initiatives Conference Grant Program.

·                    Better recognize and accommodate the differing models of conference governance and expectations of leadership by chancellor/presidents within Division III.

 

Structure of the Advisory Group.

·                    One chancellor/president from each Division III voting conference not currently represented on the Presidents Council or Management Council, as well as two representatives from the Association of Division III Independents (total 28). 
Appropriate efforts shall be made to ensure the diversity of the group including, at a minimum, at least one person who is an ethnic minority and at least two persons of each gender; a single member shall not be considered to meet both minimums.

·                    Each conference executive of conferences not currently represented was asked to identify a chancellor/president to serve on the Advisory Group.

·                    Primary duties include advising and providing input to the fifteen members of the Division III Presidents Council and facilitate communication from the Presidents Council to
chancellor/president colleagues in their respective conferences/group of independents. 

·                    Advisory Group members serve a minimum of two years, and a maximum of three years.  Alternates or designees (chancellor/president only) may be invited to attend the meeting, if necessary.  Advisory Group members will be encouraged to assume vacancies on the Division III Presidents Council, as appropriate and based on demographic and legislated requirements.

 


·                    In-person meetings will be held in August, immediately prior to the Presidents Council meeting and January to coincide with the annual presidential luncheon at the NCAA Convention. 

 

Discussion Topics.

 

Division III Strategic Plan.  Bridget Belgiovine, director of Division III, provided an overview of the framework and development of the strategic plan, noting its significance for planning and budget functions for the division.  The group discussed the goals and outcome measures and
encouraged greater clarity and distinction throughout the plan related to areas of broad division-wide vs. institution specific considerations and implications. 

 

Division III Budget.  The group discussed the principles for allocation of Division III resources between championships (approximately 75 percent) and non-championships (approximately 25 percent) initiatives.  The Division III allocation of resources is currently based on a 3.18 percent of the Association’s annual revenues (2006-07 - $17,826,000).  The percentage is rooted in championships allocations which existed when the Association federated in 1997.  The group also reviewed the history and evolution for the Division III reserve fund (2006-07 - $7,370,181), as well as the current mandated annual reserve of 10 percent of Division III revenue (2006-07 annual reserve = $90,340). 

 

Division III Strategic Initiatives Conference Grant Program.  The group reviewed the
oversight role of chancellors/presidents in the allocation of resources and determination of institutional and conference-wide educational programming related to the new grant program,
effective 2006-07.  The group noted that the allocated $1,503,250 may not be sufficient on a per conference basis ($31,000 to 46,000) to engage chancellors/presidents.  The group recommended that the Division III Presidents Council consider allocating additional
resources from the Division III reserve.  The group also noted that five programs totaling
approximately $2,195,000 will remain under National Office oversight including:  Women and Minority Internship Grant; Strategic Alliance Matching Grant; Student-Athlete Leadership Conferences; SWA Enhancement - NAWAA/Hers Institute and the National Association of Division III Athletics Administrators Partnership to support an annual Forum.  The total Division III allocation of resources to support nonchampionships initiatives for 2006-07 is approximately $4.8 million. 

 

Student-Athlete Well-Being.  The group received an update on a division-wide drug education and drug testing pilot initiative.  The group sought to balance the desire to battle
campus-wide alcohol and drug abuse through education and the NCAA’s interest in competitive equity and student-athlete health and safety.  Among questions raised were the objective of drug testing and concerns about testing student-athletes different from other groups of students.


Others noted that from survey data and observations by student-athletes, at least some level of substance abuse apparently occurs in Division III athletics, and that the pilot program represents a modest effort to understand the extent of the problem through education and testing.  The
program includes:

 

1.         Allocating $325,000 for 2006-07 to enhance alcohol, tobacco and other drug education programming for Division III member institutions through two existing NCAA grant
programs (i.e., CHOICES Grant and NCAA Health and Safety Speakers Grants).

2.         Implementing a voluntary two-year (academic-year September-May) comprehensive drug education and testing pilot program without penalties to include pre- and post survey for approximately 100 Division III institutions, effective 2007-08. 
Annual cost approximately $600,000 (education $100,000; testing $400,000-500,000, with up to $250,000 of Association-wide funding).

3.         Recommending the Committee on Competitive Safeguards and Medical Aspects of Sports (CSMAS) pursue social norming information and data related to use of performance enhancing drugs by Division III student-athletes.

 

[NOTE:  The Presidents Council, at its August 3 meeting, approved the program.]

 

Division III Membership Growth and Related Issues.  The group received an update on the work of the NCAA Executive Committee Working Group to Study Membership Issues; the North Coast Athletic Conference 2007 Convention legislative proposal to cap Division III membership; and an alternative proposal from the governance structure to admit annually a maximum of four fully prepared institutions (provisional or reclassifying) and hold all active Division III members more accountable to demonstrate their commitment to Division III through series of membership and legislative requirements.  The group discussed the issue of growth related to the impact of National Office programs and services, access to National Championships, philosophical differences due to diversity and size, impact on certain parts of the country and impact on
Division III governance.  The group noted that membership growth is truly an Association-wide
issue and emphasized the importance of the working group to pursue long-term, creative solutions.  The topic will also be discussed at the 2007 NCAA Convention during the Sunday Issues Forum on January 7.

 

2007 NCAA Convention.  The Chancellor/Presidents Advisory Group reviewed the Convention meeting schedule and discussion topics for chancellors/presidents, noting the goals of efficiency and engagement. 

 

Saturday January 6 - 5:30 to 6:30 p.m.

·                    Division III Presidents Council hosted Reception.

 

 


Sunday January 7

Issues Forum - 9 to 11:30 a.m.

·                    NCAA and Campus Partnership - Integration in Division III:  What Does It Mean; How Do We Achieve It; Are We Creation an Overall Positive Environment.

·                    NCAA Executive Committee Working Group to Study Membership Issues - Update.

·                    Ethical Athletics Administration.

·                    2007 Legislative Proposals - Case Scenarios and Pros and Cons. 

Chancellors/Presidents Luncheon and Issues Forum - 11:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m.

·                    NCAA SCORE Study Update. (Student-Athlete Longitudinal Study)

·                    Division III Strategic Initiatives Grant Program - Engagement of all constituents - Role of Chancellors/Presidents.

·                    Legislative Review.

 

Monday, January 8 - Division III Business Session - 8 a.m. to 3 p.m.

·                    Financial Aid Reporting Process – Results and possible changes.  Commitment to core tenet.

·                    Creating an Effective Athletics Leadership Team – legislative and legal issues of SWA.

·                    DIII Student-Athlete Well-Being – ways to address substance abuse through year-round drug education and testing program.

·                    Nominating Committee update.

·                    Voting.

 

            Other business. 

·                    The next meeting of the Chancellor/Presidents Advisory Group will be Sunday, January 7, 2007, at the Division III Chancellors/Presidents Luncheon and Issues Forum.

·                    The group requested the compilation of an Executive Summary following each meeting to share with colleagues.